This week Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm ofConsumer Reports magazine, issued a press release questioning the safety of pork and countering pork industry claims that a recent Consumer Reportsarticle was off-base.
In the press release, Jean Halloran, director of Food Policy Initiatives for Consumers Union says the organization thinks government regulators and pork producers need to take some additional steps to insure the safety of pork.
Last month, Consumer Reports released a studyon the safety of pork. The magazine claimed that 69% of the pork chops and ground pork tested as part of their study contained a bacteria calledYersinia enterocolitica. Salmonella and Staphyloccus aureus also showed up in the tests. In addition, almost all of the bacteria found on pork were said to be resistant to one or more antibiotics. Further, 20% of samples tested contained low levels of ractopamine, “a growth promoting drug that is banned in the European Union and China on safety grounds,” according to Halloran’s release.
Consumers Union believes these results are serious cause for concern. Consequently, Consumers Union is urging theU.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)and theU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)to reduce these pathogens and eliminate ractopamine from pork products, and address antibiotic resistance by ending the use of antibiotics on livestock except for treatment of sick animals.
The release states, “The pork industry, focused on its bottom line, unfortunately responded by attempting to shoot the messenger.Despite the ConsumerReports test being one of the largest pork surveys of its kind to date, the pork industry attacked the study’s sample size as was too small and called the story ‘sensationalism.’”
The release continues, “Given Consumer Reports findings of Yersinia in more than two-thirds of pork samples tested, we think that pork producers, rather than complaining about test results, should start trying to reduce this pathogen. USDA should also begin to regulate it. We haveurgedUSDA to do a larger research study, something it has been considering since at least 2010. USDA planned to test for this pathogen in its 2010 Nationwide Market Hog Microbiological Baseline Survey (MHBS) ‘because the transfer of these pathogens may occur…during slaughter.’ This USDA survey is designed to estimate the national prevalence and levels of bacteria in pork of public health concern. However inexplicably, when the actual study involving tests on thousands of samples, was completed, USDAfailedto test forYersinia. Rather, it tested only for salmonella–which USDA (and Consumer Reports) found at very low levels, less than five percent of samples.”
Halloran says that Richard Raymond, USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety in the Bush Administration, in ablog, argued that Consumer Reports “purported 69% contamination rate” seems inconsistent with a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) finding of just 950 laboratory-confirmed cases ofYersinia-induced illness in people in 2009, and asks how Consumer Reports can explain this.
According to Consumers Union, CDC saysthat the 950 confirmed cases are just the tip of the iceberg because the vast majority of cases of food borne illness go unreported and they estimate that each year there are more likely to be close to 100,000 cases of foodborne illness caused byYersinia.
“Consumers Union also urges the industry and the FDA to eliminate use of antibiotics in pork production except for treatment of sick animals.,” Halloran writes. “ We, and more than a dozen major medical organizations including the American Medical Association, the Infectious Disease Society of America, the World Health Organization, the American Public Health Association and many more, allbelievethat antibiotic use in animals is an important contributingcause of resistance problems in humans, and that because of this, at the very least, use of these valuable drugs should be prohibited for growth promotion use in animals.”
The release concludes, “Given the seriousness of the current crisis of antibiotic resistance,Consumers Union has launched a Meat Without Drugs campaign to convince major supermarket chains to sell only meat and poultry raised without antibiotics.”
Seewww.NotInMyFood.orgfor information on this effort.