NHF Digital Edition

Get our FREE digital edition! Subscribe here.

Curing Water Wastage In Postweaning Pigs

It is often thought that pigs at weaning are substituting water for feed consumption, resulting in a temporary weight loss, as they adapt to eating solid food.

But researchers at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada have discovered that most water usage after weaning is actually water wastage.

They also found that the use of a push-lever bowl drinker reduces water wastage without hurting water and feed intake or affecting piglet behavior.

Compared to the standard nipple drinker, the push-lever bowl drinker reduces daily water wastage per pig by more than 27 fluid oz. through two weeks after weaning (Table 1). Based on 15 pigs/drinker device, changing one nipple drinker to a push-lever bowl drinker can reduce water loss by about 1,300 gal./year.

Using drinker devices other than the standard nipple drinker may ease piglets' transition to solid food and prevent the development of behavior problems such as excessive water intake and belly nosing.

In the experiment, researchers examined the effect of drinker type on water and food intake, growth rate and belly-nosing behavior in the newly weaned piglet.

Eighteen pens of 15 piglets each (270 piglets) were weaned at about 18 days of age and housed in pens containing a standard nipple, push-lever bowl or a float bowl water source. Performance was monitored by pen through two weeks after weaning. Piglets with the nipple drinker wasted much more water than other piglets, while piglets on the float bowl consumed much less water.

Drinker type also greatly affected feeding behavior; piglets with the push-lever bowl spent less time at the feeder than other piglets, although there was no difference in feed intake or overall average daily gain.

Piglets with the push-lever bowl also tended to belly nose and perform other nosing behaviors less than piglets with the float bowl.

These results indicate that piglets use more water during the first two days after weaning, but much of that water is wasted rather than satiating needs.

Excessive drinking and water wastage can be solved through the use of push-lever drinkers without negative effects on feed intake and growth rates.

Researcher: Stephanie Torrey, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy & Swine Research & Development Centre, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; and Tina Widowski, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Contact Torrey by phone (819) 565-9174, ext. 129, by fax (819) 565-5507 or e-mail torreys@agr.gc.ca.

Table 1. Overall Water Consumed, Wasted and Used at the Three Drinker Devices
Drinker type
Water (ml/pig/d)
Water wasted, %
Consumed
Wasted
Used
Float
475
295
770
38.3
Nipple
870
1,114
1,981
56.1
Push-lever
774
186
960
19.3

More Animal Welfare Research Articles:
‘Pig-Friendly’ Loading Chute Minimizes Loading Stressors
Management Effects on Group Sow Housing
Electric Prod Use Can Be Costly
View all 2007 Swine Research Review Articles

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.



Most Recent Story


Most Recent Articles



National Hog Farmer TV

Resources

  • Industry Resources
  • Calendar
  • Blueprint Issues
  • Career Opportunities
  • Pork Checkoff
  • Quarterly/Weekly Hog and Pig Reports
  • Product Info
  • People
  • Production Posters
  • Green Agriculture
  • State of the Pork Industry Report
  • New Product Tour

Current Issue

Costs, Price Pressures Ease Just a Little

There was a lot to be positive about in the pork industry the last week of October. I realize it is difficult to be optimistic when you are still losing $25 to $30/head. I also realize that positive news at this point could be as dangerous as it is welcome. But facts are facts, and we must recognize them. ...

Current Issue

The "Good" and "Bad" Sides of a Cheaper Dollar

As I begin this week's column, I"m reminded of two different "flip side" statements that may help characterize the topic at hand. The first is the old Archie Campbell schtick - "That's good - no that’s bad," which I have used before. The second reflects President Truman's frustration with economists' incessant use of the qualifier - "on the other hand" - to introduce the contrary opinion on a given topic. President Truman once demanded in his usual colorful language: "Will someone please find me a *!&%$*?>

Marketplace Ads

  • VAL-CO

    Swine Heat Stress. Start thinking about your summer cooling options.

  • Advertise in our Marketplace

    Advertise your business here! Find out how.

  • U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps for sale

    Ag Maps for Sale: U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps

Back Issues Archive