NHF Digital Edition

Get our FREE digital edition! Subscribe here.

Manure Isn’t What it Used to Be

With crop fertility costs increasing, pork producers can improve their bottom line by sampling manure to confirm its nutrient levels, says Tom Miller, extension swine specialist for Iowa State University.

As commercial fertilizer prices have skyrocketed the last several years, producers have responded by using more and more hog manure as the main source of fertilizer for their crops.

But many of those producers are basing manure application rates on book values that were established 5-12 years ago, Miller comments.

“This data was accurate for the time period which it represents, but with modern ration formulation many producers are including synthetic amino acids for balancing protein needs of growing swine. Phytase is also being used to reduce phosphorus excretion. The net result of these practices is that manure isn’t what it used to be,” he stresses.

Miller says the most accurate way to measure nutrients in manure is to sample it as it’s stirred and hauled. Iowa State University has a publication to help producers determine application rates based on nutrient content at www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1558.pdf.

Producers should sample and analyze manure each year and compare the findings with the previous year’s results to gain a more accurate picture of the pit’s analysis.

To sample a pit ahead of pumping for potash and nitrogen levels, a bucket dip test works fairly well. To sample for phosphorus, use a sampling probe as this nutrient tends to mostly be found in the heavy sludge in the bottom of the pit, Miller says.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.



Most Recent Story


Most Recent Articles



National Hog Farmer TV

Resources

  • Industry Resources
  • Calendar
  • Blueprint Issues
  • Career Opportunities
  • Pork Checkoff
  • Quarterly/Weekly Hog and Pig Reports
  • Product Info
  • People
  • Production Posters
  • Green Agriculture
  • State of the Pork Industry Report
  • New Product Tour

Current Issue

Costs, Price Pressures Ease Just a Little

There was a lot to be positive about in the pork industry the last week of October. I realize it is difficult to be optimistic when you are still losing $25 to $30/head. I also realize that positive news at this point could be as dangerous as it is welcome. But facts are facts, and we must recognize them. ...

Current Issue

The "Good" and "Bad" Sides of a Cheaper Dollar

As I begin this week's column, I"m reminded of two different "flip side" statements that may help characterize the topic at hand. The first is the old Archie Campbell schtick - "That's good - no that’s bad," which I have used before. The second reflects President Truman's frustration with economists' incessant use of the qualifier - "on the other hand" - to introduce the contrary opinion on a given topic. President Truman once demanded in his usual colorful language: "Will someone please find me a *!&%$*?>

Marketplace Ads

  • VAL-CO

    Swine Heat Stress. Start thinking about your summer cooling options.

  • Advertise in our Marketplace

    Advertise your business here! Find out how.

  • U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps for sale

    Ag Maps for Sale: U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps

Back Issues Archive