NHF Digital Edition

Get our FREE digital edition! Subscribe here.

Cash Flow Hedges Have Accounting Implications

Understanding the pros and cons of hedge accounting should be considered in your risk management plan.

Hedging and key risk management principles have become mainstream financial tools for many pork producers as they look to manage the risks associated with buying grain and selling hogs.

Hedging is an investment to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in an asset. Derivative contracts, such as futures, forwards, puts and calls are now a part of everyday operations as lenders encourage producers to implement risk management strategies.

A futures contract is a financial contract obligating the buyer to purchase an asset (or the seller to sell an asset), such as a physical commodity or a financial instrument, at a predetermined future date and price.

Option contracts, such as puts and calls, give a buyer the right, but not the obligation, to purchase an asset (or the seller to sell an asset) at a predetermined future date and price.

While risk management is considered a necessity from an economic standpoint, it can be a bit of a nightmare from an accounting and financial reporting perspective. But no matter how frightening it may be, understanding how the use of risk management tools affects your financial statements can make a significant impact on your reported earnings. This is especially pertinent as financial statements are being more scrutinized by lenders and potential investors.

Many pork production companies use derivatives for economic hedge purposes to manage the cash flows of purchasing feed supplies and managing hog sales prices. The accounting can vary based on the type of transaction, the financial instrument used and the final decision about whether or not to use hedge accounting. From a financial reporting perspective, these cash flow hedges are accounted for as purchase commitments, derivative contracts not electing hedge accounting and derivative contracts electing hedge accounting. Each is summarized below:

  • Purchase commitments

    Typically, a pork producer purchases grain with either a fixed price or fixed amount with a grain producer. But because there is typically no net cash settlement provision, these contracts are not recorded on your financial statements until the transaction occurs.

  • Derivative contracts — not electing hedge accounting

    Because futures, puts and calls have fair value and markets at which to settle these contracts, they are required to be marked to market. If hedge accounting has not been elected, the unrecorded gain or loss on these contracts is required to be marked to market with the offset to the net change in the contract value flowing through the income statement. This can cause wide swings in the income statement when commodity markets change dramatically, as we saw in 2008. While this method can result in significant fluctuations in the income statement, this method requires substantially less documentation and testing for effectiveness than hedge accounting, as discussed below.

  • Derivative contracts — electing hedge accounting

    When contracts are selected for hedge accounting, these contracts are still required to be marked to market. However, the unrealized gain or loss will be reported through other comprehensive income (a part of stockholder's equity), instead of the income statement. The gain or loss is not reflected on the income statement until the underlying hedged transaction is complete.

In reality, for pork producers, this income statement effect will not happen immediately. Since this will first change the value of the grain fed to the hogs, it will not truly affect the income statement until these hogs are sold.

Formally, the following documentation and testing are required to qualify for hedge accounting:

“At inception of the hedge, there is formal documentation of the hedging relationship and the entity's risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, including identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the hedging instrument's effectiveness in hedging the exposure to the hedged transaction's variability in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk will be assessed.” (Statements of Financial Accounting Standards 133, paragraph 28).

Continue on Page 2

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.



Most Recent Story


Most Recent Articles



National Hog Farmer TV

Resources

  • Industry Resources
  • Calendar
  • Blueprint Issues
  • Career Opportunities
  • Pork Checkoff
  • Quarterly/Weekly Hog and Pig Reports
  • Product Info
  • People
  • Production Posters
  • Green Agriculture
  • State of the Pork Industry Report
  • New Product Tour

Current Issue

New Rules for Risk Management

Risk management, it seems, has always been viewed favorably by pork producers. Problem is, it's rarely practiced to any great degree. ...

Current Issue

"Swine Flu" - It's Time to Move On

Something bad has happened to you. It wasn't deserved and it wasn't fair. The people who did it are callous and heartless (at least in regard to you), and lazy, or they would not have done it. But they did it. It's over. It's done. You can whine and wallow in self-pity and martyrdom or pick yourself up, dust yourself off and get on with life and the business of raising quality pork. ...

Marketplace Ads

  • VAL-CO

    Swine Heat Stress. Start thinking about your summer cooling options.

  • Advertise in our Marketplace

    Advertise your business here! Find out how.

  • U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps for sale

    Ag Maps for Sale: U.S. Crop and Livestock Maps

Back Issues Archive