Pork Board: Consumer Reports Article Off Base

The Consumer Reports magazine story published Tuesday morning does a great disservice to American consumers who deserve better in the national conversation about safe food, says Chris Novak, chief executive officer of the National Pork Board, which works on behalf of U.S. pork farmers. 

More About:

Pork Checkoff

The Consumer Reports magazine story published Tuesday morning does a great disservice to American consumers who deserve better in the national conversation about safe food, says Chris Novak, chief executive officer of the National Pork Board, which works on behalf of U.S. pork farmers. 

“American farmers produce some of the safest pork in the world.   We care about the safety and quality of the pork products that we know our consumers love.  We believe Consumer Reports has not accurately portrayed the safety and quality of pork products.”

“For consumers who are interested in food safety, there is one point in the Consumer Report’s story that pork producers can agree with,” notes Steve Larsen, director of pork safety for the Pork Checkoff.  “The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service has determined that cooking whole muscle pork cuts to 145 degrees F. and allowing the meat to rest at least three minutes before serving, and cooking ground pork products to 160 degrees F., will destroy all bacteria, even those that might be antibiotic-resistant.  For consumers seeking information about pork safety, preparation, and handling, the USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service Fact Sheet on pork is an excellent resource (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/Pork_From_Farm_to_Table/#2).

“Raising healthy animals helps ensure that we produce healthy and safe food,” Larsen adds.  “For example, one of the reasons pork farmers began raising animals indoors was to protect their pigs from pests that can cause trichinosis.  Farms are a natural environment where bacteria are present, so farmers have invested millions of dollars in research to understand how antibiotics and other tools can help us produce a healthier, safer, product for consumers.  We know that we don’t have all the answers today, but we are continuing to work to improve the safety, healthfulness, and quality of our pork.”

“The bottom line for consumers is that properly cooked pork is safe for you and your family,” Novak concludes.  “Consumers deserve to have a choice when purchasing pork products.  The good news is that, contrary to the latest Consumer Reports story, you don’t have to buy one type of product or shop at one store to have confidence in the healthfulness of the pork you are purchasing.”

The National Pork Board has responsibility for Checkoff-funded research, promotion and consumer information projects and for communicating with pork producers and the public. Through a legislative national Pork Checkoff, pork producers invest $0.40 for each $100 value of hogs sold. Importers of pork products contribute a like amount, based on a formula. The Pork Checkoff funds national and state programs in advertising, consumer information, retail and foodservice marketing, export market promotion, production improvement, technology, swine health, pork safety and environmental management. For information on Checkoff-funded programs, pork producers can call the Pork Checkoff Service Center at (800) 456-7675 or check the Internet at www.pork.org.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discuss this Article 7

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 28, 2012

Please stop using antibiotics in pork and any other "thing" that is not part of human diet. If human would not eat it, don't give it to hogs. If we want to ingest medication, we will go to a pharmacy and buy what we want or need. Pork should not be a serving of antibiotics. Enough with the propaganda and stop poisoning the people living in the US.

Nicole (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2012

1. Please tell me what to do with the sick pigs then if you don't want antibiotics in them. 2. Surprise, even organic eggs have come from chickens who were treated with antibiotics (they just take them out of production after receiving their shots and then they wait a specified amount of time and send the hens back to lay eggs) 3. Antibiotics given to the hog shouldn't affect you unless you are allergic to something. Read something knowledgeable and not blogs and newspapers and you might learn a little. These sources love to portray the industry as the bad guy. There's nothing wrong with this stuff!

thetimchannel (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2012

I won't eat US meat because of the inhumane condition under which it is raised. Pork production is particularly egregious. The mass confinement hog facilities can only exist because of the antibiotics available to keep them from dying from living in their own filth before you can slaughter them. No thanks. Enjoy.

LovePork (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2012

Let the pigs go outside and be pigs. Best would be as part of an integrated farm rather than isolated in a barn. And stop using antibiotics to make up for the fact that you rear your hogs too close together indoors, as this will only cause antibiotic-resistant bacteria and simply produce worse diseases. We depend on our farmers to feed us, and I'd rather they didn't breed diseases and make our antibiotics worthless in the process.

Green King Ludd (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2012

Interesting how the word "choice" comes into play in your comments. How about consumers having a "choice" in knowing what goes into producing their foods? I am all for "choice" but "choice" means telling the TRUTH about your methods and inputs. GMO grains and over use of antibiotics are the TRUTH about factory farmed pork. You can NOT have CHOICE without TRUTH and TRUTH is something woefully lacking in your industry and in your press release. All I saw was SPIN in your comments.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2012

What a load of rubbish!!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Dec 1, 2012

Antibiotics are the last resource for sick animals. Antibiotics should NOT be used to prevent disease but to cure IF they are previously approved.
Using antibiotics when it is not necessary is costly and increases resistant bacteria populations. Cooking can kill pathogens but not all toxic chemicals.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your National Hog Farmer ID
(optional)

Newsletter Signup