Purdue Economist Addresses Ethanol Mandate

Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) Vice President Geoff Cooper said recently that if a partial waiver of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) is granted, as requested by some governors and a number of agricultural organizations, and it did reduce the amount of corn used for ethanol and biodiesel production, there would be consequences. Cooper says it would mean the price of distiller’s grain and soybean meal would increase and net feed costs might actually increase for some livestock and poultry feeders.

More About:

Ethanol Plant.
Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) Vice President Geoff Cooper said recently that if a partial waiver of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) is granted, as requested by some governors and a number of agricultural organizations, and it did reduce the amount of corn used for ethanol and biodiesel production, there would be consequences.
Karen McMahon

Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) Vice President Geoff Cooper said recently that if a partial waiver of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) is granted, as requested by some governors and a number of agricultural organizations, and it did reduce the amount of corn used for ethanol and biodiesel production, there would be consequences. Cooper says it would mean the price of distiller’s grain and soybean meal would increase and net feed costs might actually increase for some livestock and poultry feeders.

Purdue University agricultural economist Chris Hurt counters that is not necessarily the correct direction. “If the partial waiver is issued and if the partial waiver does reduce the amount of corn used for ethanol, then corn prices would move downward (assuming other things stay the same).

“In addition, lower corn prices mean that dried distiller’s with solubles (DDGS) prices will move down also in the case of a partial waiver that lowers corn use for ethanol. Lower corn and DDGS prices would mean that prices for other feed ingredients would also move lower,” he says.

What happens is when a reduction in the use of corn ethanol occurs, it increases the supply of corn for feeding (and other non-fuel uses), and that lowers corn and other feed ingredient prices, Hurt explains.

In a research model developed at Purdue, it is estimated that a reduction of corn use for ethanol from 13.8 billion gallons to 11.8 billion gallons would drop corn prices for the 2012 crop from $7.81/bu. to $7.14/bu. That comes to about $3 billion less corn costs for the U.S. livestock industry from the 2102 corn crop, he says.

Hurt says the model did not calculate the DDGS prices, but he estimates that the price of DDGS would fall about $18 to $20/ton from $233 to about $214/ton.

Purdue’s paper addressing this topic can be found at http://www.farmfoundation.org/webcontent/Potential-Impacts-of-Waiving-Ethanol-Blending-Rules-1841.aspx.

But Hurt admits that other work done by livestock economists may override that modeling and seems to suggest that a partial waiver of the RFS by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would have less to do with the amount of corn used for ethanol than would the economics and flexibilities of refiners and blenders.

“One of the requirements in the energy law is that for EPA to accept a partial waiver, it must be shown that a partial waiver will directly relieve the financial stress (to the animal industries) caused by the mandate. We agricultural economists do not believe that a partial waiver will, for sure, reduce the amount of corn used for ethanol. That will depend on oil prices, corn prices and how flexible the oil industry can be in their production processes,” he explains.

The EPA is slated to rule on the waiver request by Nov. 13.

 

Discuss this Article 5

Frank Bilek (not verified)
on Oct 30, 2012

If you restrict the supply of DDGS because of a waiver, prices would go up! How can the guy from Purdue argue otherwise? Already we've seen DDGS price increase sharply because ethanol plants are shutting down. Now, instead of DDGS being 85% the price of corn, it is priced at 100% or 105%--this ratio will only go higher with less DDGS.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Oct 31, 2012

no frank, the disillers prices go up along with corn and the higher corn is the less ethanol plants make so they soak the livestock producers (the ones who put food on everyones table) so they dont lose money.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 3, 2012

You are incorrect in your analogy of what a reduced corn price will do to the cost of ddgs. Ddgs is only used in livestock diets "if" it provides a cost benefit. The use of ddgs in livestock feeds will only go higher as compared to corn "if" it still saves on feed costs. At 105% of the price of corn there is not much incentive to utilize ddgs in most swine diets. For this reason what Dr. Hurt is saying is correct.

Iowa corn and hog farmer (not verified)
on Oct 31, 2012

DG prices have shot up in my area in north cental IA. DG cost per ton was more than corn cost recently--haven't seen that in a very long time. I think a few ethanol plants shutting down in MN is affecting our market. seems like simple supply-demand. Demand for DG (and ALL feed) is very strong--if you reduce supply of DG, but demand isn't reduced, why shouldn't we expect prices to rise? corn price wouldn't fall much with waiver of the mandate anyhow.

Felix Gorges (not verified)
on Nov 2, 2012

If the price of corn comes down, it will drag the price of soybeans, cottonseed, and other sources of protein down. DDGS are not the only source of protein.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your National Hog Farmer ID
(optional)

Newsletter Signup

Connect With Us