Agricultural economists at North Carolina State University (NCSU) have received $465,000 to study different types of marketing arrangements in the hog and pork industries.
NCSU is part of a group of researchers headed by the Research Triangle Institute at Raleigh, NC, which received a $4.3 million contract from the Agriculture Department’s Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Administration to study livestock and meat marketing for hogs, cattle and sheep.
NCSU agricultural economists led by Tomislav Vukina will review numerous surveys, transaction data and conduct economic analyses to include:
Identifying and determining the use of emerging types of marketing arrangements such as production and marketing contracts;
Determining terms of the marketing arrangements and their availability to entities of different sizes and in different geographic locations; and
Determining the long-term implications of swine marketing arrangements on operating costs, animal and meat quality, marketing risks, livestock and meat prices and the structure of the livestock and meat packing industries.
There was a lot to be positive about in the pork industry the last week of October. I realize it is difficult to be optimistic when you are still losing $25 to $30/head. I also realize that positive news at this point could be as dangerous as it is welcome. But facts are facts, and we must recognize them.
...
As I begin this week's column, I"m reminded of two different "flip side" statements that may help characterize the topic at hand. The first is the old Archie Campbell schtick - "That's good - no that’s bad," which I have used before. The second reflects President Truman's frustration with economists' incessant use of the qualifier - "on the other hand" - to introduce the contrary opinion on a given topic. President Truman once demanded in his usual colorful language: "Will someone please find me a *!&%$*?>